Market Data 
Markets
Replies to post #183 on Philip Morris International Inc (PM)
04/27/24 7:30 PM
$PM annotatedNewly Mintedmockup figuresof Hammel inSelf-serving way to show features that are not shown or discussed in Hammel itself
$PM recognized Hammel’s disclosure was lacking
05/05/24 4:28 PM
$HCMCs amended complaint, presents an Even Stronger Case in Favor of $HCMC
These specific, targeted allegations are sufficient to disavow
the contradictory statements in the attached MRTPA in which
Philip Morris Self-Reported that its products do not combust.
"Less Combustion = No Combustion" (based on Nonsense)
We thus hold that, in its original complaint,$HCMC stated a valid claim for patent infringement
under Eleventh Circuit law notwithstanding attachment of the MRTPA exhibit. II
We now turn to HCM’s amended complaint, which presents an even stronger case in favor of HCM.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58a1d7b8893fc0b6d3e47931/t/6436df8d94fa09523deadf45/1681317773824/2023-04-12_HCMC_v_PM_Appellate_Decision.pdf
09/26/24 7:17 AM
InCourt UnderOath PhilipMorris Self-Reported its products don't combust."Less Combustion = No Combustion"
(based on Nonsense)
We thus hold that, in its original complaint, $HCMC stated a valid claim for patent infringement under 11th Circuit law notwithstanding attachment of the MRTPA exhibit. II
We now turn to $HCMC s amended complaint, which presents an even stronger case in favor of $HCMC.
https://www.pacermonitor.com/case/37309414/Healthier_Choices_Management_Corp_v_Philip_Morris_USA,_Inc_et_al
10/03/24 4:16 PM
this goes to jury trial, $PM is done & they know it. With all the dead from lung cancer(Marlboro cigarettes) $PM will get slammed by a jury so hard they may not recover. Also they have been making billions on the patent they infringed upon.
Jury will also not forget that either.
10/22/24 1:50 PM
$PM annotatedNewly Mintedmockup figuresof Hammel in self-serving way to show features that are not shown or discussed in Hammel itself.
$PM recognized Hammel’s disclosure was lacking
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58a1d7b8893fc0b6d3e47931/t/6436df8d94fa09523deadf45/1681317773824/2023-04-12_HCMC_v_PM_Appellate_Decision.pdf
10/23/24 11:00 AM
10/29/24 2:32 PM
10/29/24 5:03 PM
$PM annotatedNewly Mintedmockup figuresof Hammel in self-serving way to show features that are not shown or discussed in Hammel itself. InCourt UnderOath PhilipMorris Self-Reported its products don't combust."Less Combustion = No Combustion" (based on Nonsense)
$PM recognized Hammel’s disclosure was lacking
We thus hold that, in its original complaint, HCMC stated a valid claim for patent infringement under 11th Circuit law notwithstanding attachment of the MRTPA exhibit. II
We now turn to HCMCs amended complaint, which presents an even stronger case in favor of HCMC.
https://www.pacermonitor.com/case/37309414/Healthier_Choices_Management_Corp_v_Philip_Morris_USA,_Inc_et_al
11/02/24 11:50 PM
11/09/24 6:59 AM
11/14/24 6:14 AM
11/16/24 8:49 AM
12/29/24 5:47 PM
12/30/24 6:51 PM
AI
