You didn't like I pointed out the fact that the world premier med journal the Lancet published a FRAUDULENT article based on a non-existent worldwide hydroxy trial that claimed the non-existent trial was not efficacious and dangerous.
Now Janice, I will ask you too, as I did Blackhawk, how did this premier worldwide editor who is most likely a scientist/doctor, how come he didn't check the sources which easily showed there were no sources, none existed???????
Does the Gold Standard Lancet simply take the word of a known FRAUDSTER (there were indicators that the submitter had a shady past).
You are always fact checking as an IHUB poster, researching, doesn't it look really, really, bad and stupid and questionable how a non-existent study got published in the Lancet and then was promoted to suppress hydroxy.
It takes an awful lot of speculation, could there have been a "conspiracy" or maybe Qanon fooled them, could that be the real reason? Please let the audience here know since you proudly cite "credible" sources, how could a "credible" source be such a blundering source of FRAUD???????
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
