It actually is an administrative regulation/law, I believe I did post it a while ago. When I come across it I will post again.
I can't believe after all this discussion and my repeated, maybe 50 times or more stating that the therapeutics were suppressed because if they were effective, the EUA could not be issued, vaccine could not be on the market.
That's why the Lancet put out the FRAUD study (which was non-existent) in/around Mar. 2020 to give "legitimacy" that hydroxy was NOT effective. At the time doctor's could dispense hydroxy to patients, then immediately upon the Lancet article the FDA w/in days came out with a ruling that hydroxy could only be used in hospital NOT while at home. NIH knew that hospital use of hydroxy would never be effective, it had to be used as an early treatment. Hence, they set the stage, by manipulating the Lancet article to in effect ban hydroxy and clear the way for the EUA (no EUA if that hydroxy was used at home and shown effective.)
After a month or two, the Lancet retracted the FAKE hydroxy study and FDA immediately changed hydroxy use by doctors "at their discretion." No need now to restrict hydroxy the EUA was awarded and the Lancet bum article did its job.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
