Seriously good article you uncovered. Am I to read into the article stating at least twice that PM stated the product is heated but mot burned? Please remind me if that was part of the suit against PM i.e. the burned verses heated. And please comment if that is a favorable situation. Did HCMC have a patent that burned or heated I guess is what I am asking. Thanks in advance. I smell big money here. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/tobacco-iqos-science/