Well, let say it's a big pharma scientist on Fox News? Would that scientist be not credible if he based his opinion on science? Just trying to determine how you will try to justify your position if you are proven wrong.
You say they (children) aren't dying or even falling ill in large numbers, why would one child have to die when the Covid is a lesser threat to children than the vaccine? I don't understand your logic? Children haven't been dying of Covid???
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
