News Focus
News Focus
icon url

SamuraiProgrammer

07/03/21 2:36 PM

#662219 RE: User-793611 #662215

Interesting theory that holds merit depending on how many COOP shares might be distributed.

If one were reasonably certain of the value of the hidden assets and reasonably certain there would be a stock distribution to 'buy' them, one could short COOP in advance to keep the share price low. This would increase the number of shares that need to be distributed to 'match' the value of the assets.

Once the distribution occurs, some of the shares balance the short shares. Now you could conceivably have more shares left after that than you would have gotten in advance.

I wish I had thought of that maneuver! Very insightful, serafino!

As for insider trading complications, all that has to be done is to show valid reasoning for the trade that does not involve future distributions. I bet there are already documents (or at least emails) detailing those reasons in place for when (if) the SEC comes knocking.

icon url

xoom

07/03/21 3:02 PM

#662221 RE: User-793611 #662215

Serafino, Let’s just consider Bban’s friend’s text about the $97 per UQ with a screenshot that Bban still has, and that too twice !!! (Nobody can make this up)

$ 32 ish (current COOP share price) times 3 = $97 (close)(per share escrow common)
So times 3 is the key !!!

Speculation at best
FWIW

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164560116
icon url

Sunnybank

07/03/21 9:21 PM

#662235 RE: User-793611 #662215

Hence, perhaps, why COOP is the tell (?).