Replies to post #378463 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[blackhawks]

Experts, of course, make mistakes; s'why they're not called infallibles.

That said, which of these two should earn our trust most often? People whose education and profession equip them with knowledge and judgement that are based upon an apolitical science based methodology and approach to issues and problems, or conspiracy theory believing, conclusion jumping, ideologues who pull their arguments out of their asses?

Scientific American or Natural News?

[fuagf]

stock_observer_77, Only the experts who are sticking to the preponderance of the best evidence at any time, on any subject.

"Experts are a hit here"

There are experts who fall into the anti-global warming group.

On the covid question. You have Bannon.

They once peddled misinformation for Guo Wengui and Steve Bannon. Now they're speaking out
[...]
One of the group's most successful campaigns popularised discredited claims by a virologist .. https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2020-10-09/anti-beijing-group-with-links-to-steve-bannon-misinformation/12735638 .. who said COVID-19 was deliberately manufactured in a Chinese lab.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164540428

On the present best available evidence we'll go with Fauci.

See also:

stockmule, Your certainty as regards a conspiratorial vein of thought is...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164219853