stockmule, stockmule, Your certainty as regards a conspiratorial vein of thought is confusing. What you and Wade say could be true, HOWEVER, at this point in time the great preponderance of evidence says it is most likely not the case. So i ask you WHY do you take a position of certainty in the face of the evidence at hand??
"I remember when the wuhan lab leak was a conspiracy laden post of mine, you should also."
"How about we stop creating and doing gain of function ourselves."
Why do you take that position in contradiction of the weight of evidence??? Is it that you see all experts as Fauci and Shi Zhengli and most all others as all part of the conspiracy. See:
A US researcher who worked with a Wuhan virology lab gives 4 reasons why a coronavirus leak would be extremely unlikely "Trump Officials Are Said to Press Spies to Link Virus and Wuhan Labs
[...]
How conspiracy theories about COVID-19 went viral – Sydney Morning Herald [.. outed here .. This story of a virus built in a lab is one of the most popular out there, but perhaps the most easily debunked. The new strain’s genome has now been studied by thousands of scientists all around the world. They’ve already found a close match in a bat virus discovered in 2013, and say this new strain can only have evolved in nature – it’s too good to be a cut and paste job, and it would make a pretty poor weapon as it is highly contagious (and so uncontrollable) but not as deadly as other pathogens.] https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=156692968
conix, This "There’s no conclusive evidence that any of the changes were made for sinister reasons." says almost it all. "What is China covering up about the coronavirus?" After pushing an unfounded anti-China conspiracy theory, and smearing a renowned scientist the most-not-divine, but dishonest Miranda Devine says the above. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=155503529
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
