Suspect more and more info to come out as drip drip. Easier for cabal to disclose slowly than continue to lie and face more public rath. Chinese defector Dong and terabytes of info may have untold information about spys, $$ deals and corruption. Supposedly with the DIA in Feb as they vetted his info. Sec of State Blinken didn't know it when the chinese asked for him back in March. Could be the reason for the about face on admitting the possibility of a virus leak from wuhan. It is going to get very exciting in the near future. Imagine if there is information on china hacking dominion machines and changing vote totals, just my speculation, as Trvmp never conceded the election. I got to get more popcorn https://www.newsweek.com/who-dong-jingwei-alleged-china-defectors-disappearance-shrouded-mystery-1602946
More with your Peter Dasszak -A US researcher who worked with a Wuhan virology lab gives 4 reasons why a coronavirus leak would be extremely unlikely [... gaps excluded ..] Reason 1: The lab’s samples don’t match the new coronavirus Reason 2: The lab implements rigorous safety protocols Reason 3: The coronavirus is the latest in a long line of zoonotic disease outbreaks Reason 4: Everyday people are more likely to get infected than researchers who wear protection [...] Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance (which managed PREDICT’s relationship with the WIV), told NPR .. https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/04/23/841729646/virus-researchers-cast-doubt-on-theory-of-coronavirus-lab-accident .. last week that his colleagues are “finding 1 to 7 million people exposed” to zoonotic viruses in Southeast Asia each year. [...] Spillovers will keep happening The frequency of spillover events will increase as humans encroach further into wild habitats that house disease-carrying species we haven’t interacted with before, Mazet said. Researching how past spillovers happened and which habitats present the greatest risk for such events helps scientists make predictions about the next pandemic.
No, COVID-19 Coronavirus Was Not Bioengineered. Here’s The Research That Debunks That Idea
[...]
When questioned why he was using this label rather than the real scientific name of the virus, Trump claimed that it was in response to the claim that the U.S. military had created the virus. The video accompanying the following tweet shows the exchange:
Back and forth. Back and forth. Back and forth.
So, it looks like conspiracy theorists on both sides haven’t really provided any compelling evidence that SARS-CoV2 was produced in a lab, whether in the U.S., in China, or in the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.
In fact, there is not only a lack of evidence supporting these conspiracy theories, there has been growing strong scientific evidence against both of them.
Scientists, you know the ones who are actually trying to find the truth and solve a problem rather than blame people, have been conducting genetic analyses to determine where the virus came from and how it ended up infecting humans.
Although viruses aren’t exactly like people as they don’t seem to have feelings or spread rumors, viruses do have genetic material like people, except their genetic material is not quite as complex as those of humans.
Nevertheless, like humans, viruses still pass along such materials when they replicate and evolve. It’s not as simple as The Jerry Springer Show using genetic testing to find out if a guy is someone’s father, but scientists can use more advanced genetic analysis to figure out the origins, the “family tree” of SARS-CoV2.
Indeed, strong clues had already emerged by February 26, 2020, when a Perspectives piece was published in the New England Journal of Medicine. In the piece, David M. Morens, M.D. and Peter Daszak, Ph.D. from the National Institute of Health (NIH) and Jeffery K. Taubenberger, M.D., Ph.D. wrote: “Of course, scientists tell us that SARS-CoV-2 did not escape from a jar: RNA sequences closely resemble those of viruses that silently circulate in bats, and epidemiologic information implicates a bat-origin virus infecting unidentified animal species sold in China’s live-animal markets.”
This wasn’t exactly a case of same bat channel, same bat time. But the first, more deadlier SARS virus seemed to cause the 2002-2003 outbreak after it had managed to jump from bats to humans via intermediate hosts such as masked palm civets.
Yes, some masked beings may have inadvertently partnered with bats to bring the original SARS virus to humans. So it wouldn’t be too surprising if something like that happened again for SARS-CoV2.
Even more evidence of a natural rather than human-made origin for SARS-CoV2 has emerged from a study described in a research letter just published in Nature Medicine. In the letter, a research team (Kristian G. Andersen from The Scripps Research Institute, Andrew Rambaut from the University of Edinburgh, W. Ian Lipkin from the Mailman School of Public Health of Columbia University, Edward C. Holmes from The University of Sydney and Robert F. Garry from Tulane University) described how they had analyzed the genetic sequences that code for the protein spikes on the surface of SARS-CoV2. The virus looks sort of like a medieval mace with multiple spikes sticking out from its spherical shape. These spikes aren’t just for show as the virus uses them to latch on to a cell that it wants to invade and then push its way into the cell. Very medieval stuff.
Apparently, portions of these spike proteins are so effective in targeting specific receptors on human cells that it is hard to imagine humans manufacturing them, not with known existing technology.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
