News Focus
News Focus
icon url

THall

05/20/21 3:55 PM

#127913 RE: Moving On #127912

You didnt prove anything at all. Lets see something that shows SPRV owns the building. The disclosure says they dont. The Assessors office says they dont. What proof do you have that the company and the Assessors office are lying?
icon url

work-n-hard

05/20/21 4:00 PM

#127914 RE: Moving On #127912

Good Luck with that. Didn't prove it as far as I'm concerned.
I'll admit to being wrong, the day that building shows up in their filings, along with proof of revenue.
icon url

THall

05/20/21 4:00 PM

#127915 RE: Moving On #127912

Do you have a copy of the merger agreement? Why did they only issue 1/2 of the 10 million shares? Was the building excluded from the deal? Anything at all that can support your claim that the disclsure and the Assessors office are wrong?
icon url

DJ Ponder

05/20/21 4:14 PM

#127922 RE: Moving On #127912

You have proven Nothing.
icon url

rawman

05/20/21 10:05 PM

#127940 RE: Moving On #127912

The comparison is to point out the way things work in the real world.


REAL WORLD???

OMG, REAL COMPANIES DISCLOSE THE DETAILS OF THEIR MERGER AGREEMENTS AND THEIR LARGE ASSET ACQUISITIONS! A $10,000,000+ BUILDING WOULD BE DEEMED A "LARGE ASSET"! WHERE'S A COPY OF THE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT?

OBVIOUSLY, SPRV IS NOTHING LIKE A "REAL COMPANY"!