News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BOREALIS

05/17/21 10:34 AM

#374157 RE: DrHarleyboy #374152



RIGHT ON! -- on all available evidence the election was not stolen --
icon url

blackhawks

05/17/21 10:54 AM

#374160 RE: DrHarleyboy #374152

The investigations were the court cases, all of which failed to make a case for a stolen election. Burden of proof was on Trump's lawyers; they failed to shoulder it successfully, repeatedly.

When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo.

[1] This is also stated in Hitchens's razor, which declares that "what may be asserted without evidence, may be dismissed without evidence." Carl Sagan proposed a related criterion – "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" – which is known as the Sagan standard.[2]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)#Proving_a_negative