InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

WinningTrade

01/22/07 8:17 AM

#24824 RE: The Real Deal #24813

If you look at the 14a, GGI neither had rights or control of the escrow shares. No warrants were to be exercised and the SEC ruled that the debentures do not comply.

From the 14a./

previously issued convertible debentures that were in violation of Section 61 of the 1940 Act in that the debentures were convertible at rates less than fair market on the date of grant and were issued without shareholder approval. The Company believed that the nature and features of the convertible debentures were such that the instruments would not be governed by Section 61; however, the Commission subsequently determined that Section 61 did apply and that the debentures did not comply.

Mr. TrendGreen
icon url

The Real Deal

01/22/07 8:44 AM

#24835 RE: The Real Deal #24813

Well there you go then. I will give you the benefit of knowing what you are talking about unless I discover otherwise. Unfortunately most of the time when I deal with guys like you they are either misinformed or liars. In your case I will assume you're accurate.
icon url

The Real Deal

01/22/07 8:46 AM

#24837 RE: The Real Deal #24813

One more question you may know. Who loaned the money to Aero? If FCCN, where did they get the money for that loan when they couldn't even pay an auditor.