Replies to post #373544 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[DragonBear]

Really, so the working percentage is LESS than the Virus Survival Rate?

WTF is that suppose to mean? A random brain fart on your part???

WTF is the point then ???

The fact is, there isn't one.

Also, it scientifically DOES NOT PREVENT you from GETIING COVID - THAT IS A FACT.

Pay attention little zoom zoom boy... if vaccinated one has a 95% chance of not getting infected, relative to an unvaccinated population. Of those 5% vaccinated which get infected, near 0% have severe disease. That was the original Pfizer clinical trial results.

Since then the results from Israel, with a high vaccination rate using Pfizer are in.

Latest data analysis finds unvaccinated individuals were 44 times more likely to develop symptomatic COVID-19 and 29 times more likely to die from COVID-19...vaccine effectiveness was at least 97% in preventing symptomatic disease

So get you your untested, unproven, un profiled virus modifier and leave us alone who don't want it.

And you can get on your zoom zoom motorcycle, and attend the nearest Covid spreader event. And glad we agree your health insurance rates should go up. So as to cover your anti-VAX cost of your idiocy.

[blackhawks]

Applies to all vaxxes. Your attempted point falls apart when talking about a population over 300M, much less the world population.

Over 500K unvaccinated dead Americans is the control in the 'experiment'.

so the working percentage is LESS than the Virus Survival Rate?

Cost benefit applies to all diseases that have vaxxes deployed against them. No persuasive argument exists to eliminate any of those vaxxes and take the much higher resultant death tolls that were apparent before the vaxxes existed.

I'm with Dragon, don't get the vax and mix often with people like yourself. Laugh hard, unmasked and unvaxxed, as you try to score junk science points among one another.