News Focus
News Focus
icon url

WinningTrade

01/21/07 1:22 PM

#24433 RE: Stock Stallion #24428

You have made no point at all. For the benefit means nothing. It clearly also says that the shares can not be sold or voted on. They where there for a C/D that shouldl have never been allowed in the first place. If you look further into the 14a it also says that the shares issued where done illegally and the SEC has already ruled they are in violation of the 1940 act and thus "do not apply". They are worthless and will be scrapped. The only one misleading this board is you. When I clear up the matter tommorrow morning, I will accept your apology. Mr. TrendGreen
icon url

lesnshawn

01/21/07 1:38 PM

#24440 RE: Stock Stallion #24428

legalegaltx: You know, if they were issued illegally in the beginning, until the proper papers are filed to clean this all up, IMO, they must still (on paper) treat the shares in escrow as legal. Similar to the need to make revert the A/S back to it's original level, because the previous change was done without proper shareholder approval (illegally).

This actually works out perfectly in this case.

As was stated, keeping it this way - and there doesn't appear there's a damn think GGI can do about it - gives Peacock a monopoly on the company and therefore, can stear this ship in the direction he wants - away from a BDC, so they can take Aero public in a very economical way (so they can spend more of their hard earned money on moving their product).

JMO,
lns
icon url

power_forward

01/21/07 1:56 PM

#24450 RE: Stock Stallion #24428

good point--MrTrendGreen is definitely misleading the board--those 843 mil shares will never just "disappear'--GGI would never accept that and I doubt they would even take a measly 220 grand for them