News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Investorman

01/20/07 1:48 PM

#142591 RE: jazzjackrabbit #142589

Why do you insist on not reading the lawsuit? The SEC sued both the company and Rufus individually and defaults were entered against both.

icon url

massconfusion

01/20/07 1:49 PM

#142592 RE: jazzjackrabbit #142589

That's a lie, jazz. Read the complaint he defaulted on. Get back to me.
icon url

neom2006

01/20/07 1:55 PM

#142593 RE: jazzjackrabbit #142589

My friend, you are very very late to this party. Mo one wants to waste time convincing you that this is a POS. We did that a long time ago. If it is such a good deal, "buy the crap out of it". Just ask jesuspower on HSM, he was planning to be a BILLIONAIRE by now. Where you nuts come from is a mystery to me.
icon url

Hunter6110

01/20/07 3:06 PM

#142596 RE: jazzjackrabbit #142589

Ummmmmm check PACER, the court has a default judgement against rufus, as a matter of fact Rufus was in default before the company was...and buy the way both Rufus and CSHD are still in default.
icon url

janice shell

01/20/07 8:52 PM

#142622 RE: jazzjackrabbit #142589

Not true. Both Rufus and the company were sued, and both defaulted.