News Focus
News Focus
icon url

DollarBillYalll

05/02/21 12:33 PM

#162980 RE: 3X Charm #162976

Good point, however I believe the greater good of the company’s interests would be revealed due to pressure from within the company in any case, i.e. from bod, shareholders, executive team. Unless one does not trust that. In that case one should take their hard earned capital elsewhere. I surely would.

I can see that if I stood to make some of that long term/big picture upside outside of cydy to push for change at the top. No other reason in my mind to sit on this internet forum all day every day morning till night bashing an exec. Not directed at anyone in particular. I just see these people whenever I check in here and it only reinforces my investment thesis.

The ONLY benefit for a BO is transfer of long term upside to the big farmers...

This is just my humble opinion.

icon url

SaraLovesYou

05/02/21 2:28 PM

#163006 RE: 3X Charm #162976

It would be easy - his role could be downsized or buried in a contract clause. They could pay him to shut up. Not a new or novel idea....

Please clarify how CEO would not be an issue in a “partnership “.: If CYDY partners with somebody NP will be calling the shots from the CYDY perspective. I don’t see that as an appealing option to a BP partner.