I have a question on your posts, please. Your last post stated:
There are also other reasons for fails other then naked shorts not being covered.
vs.
It also shows that there are no fails to deliver, which means any naked shorting that is occurring is covered before the stock settles.
So, my question is: Are there FAILS TO DELIVER or are there NOT?
Because how I read what you're saying, any fails to deliver are either: a. Insignificant--but then that means there ARE fails to deliver OR b. Not the fault of naked shorting but are instead the result of "technical issues" which again means there ARE fails to deliver (just not the fault of naked shorting) OR c. If naked shorting IS occurring, they are covering their shorts before the stock settles, except, of course, for the ones that didn't cover because of "technical issues" OR d. Fails to deliver are non-existent.
So, yeah, I'm a little confused.
As always: Good luck to ALL, not only here, but in EVERYTHING YOU DO!!