Replies to post #334080 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[xblkbk]

Well done!! Thank you!!

[Meowza]

Defendants have abjectly refused to respond to the Rule 60 motion even though they acknowledge that under LR 7-2(d), the failure to respond to a motion typically “constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion"

in the context of Rule 60, a failure to correct clear error, constitutes an abuse of discretion

You, sir, do not f---k around. Me likey.

[Biobillionair]

I am bias....great job. BB

[scxj]

Brilliant reply!
Thank you!

[momoney24]

Marjac,

Regardless of the outcome, thank you so so so much for your heroic efforts.

[dogn]

Respectful yet strong reply. Thank you again, from a relative newcomer on iHub but longtime AMRN shareholder since just before Reduce-it spike but considerably in the hole nonetheless, for your tireless efforts to restore lost value to so many suffering investors who believe in the science, potential and validity of the patent protection for icosapent ethyl. May Judge Du be open to seeing the truth and correcting the error.

[Biobillionair]

Michael S. Kasanoff, Esq. (pro hac vice pending
- attorney has complied with LR IA 11-2)

Attempting to set new World Record in "pro hac vice pending"....

I think there's un-DUE influence, pun indented.

BB

[Meowza]

marjac, if SCOTUS wanted to review your Rule 24/60 materials, on their own prerogative, is there anything to stop them? Are your briefs part of the record?

I understand neither Amarin nor the Raiders of the Lost IP would likely make an argument based on your filings for their own reasons.

[cruyff22]

Outstanding, easily comprehensible ,excellent case references, succinct and to the point. I hope you have your feet up ,head tilted back, a glass of your favorite in one hand, and a nice Cuban cigarin the other hand. Well done sir. Well Done

[tke458]

This is phenomenal work. Money well spent....

[Number sleven]

Marjac, Thank you for what you and your team are doing. I hope justice is still a part of the legal machine.
Sleven,

[marzan]

Wow marjac, well written, I see the language 'cropped' and 'fraud' and mistake made by the Judge that can be corrected etc etc. I bet Hikma wouldn't have a response because simply any response by them will drag them into opening the can of warms. In any case, looks like, ironically, Hikma lawyers are going to get sanctioned and don't know what Judge do will do with that con professor Heinecke. I have no mercy for them; I have lost literally everything everything because of their fraudulent activities.

[Jimcal22]

Marjac, thank you for this succinct well written reply. We are forever in your debt no matter what the outcome. Jimcal

[circuitcity]

Bravo, really appreciate the effort and determination!!

[johngnatt]

Excellent write up Marjac. Perfect rebuttal. I think Hikma made a tactical mistake here .

[kaku]

Omg! This is just amazing an reply! You are a super star! I cannot thank you and HK enough for what you have done for all the shareholders to right this wrong. Hope you and all shareholders will be blessed by the Lord with some good news. Thank you again.

[invest2992]

Marjac,
I certainly hope we win a just resolution to our rule 60 filing not only for the monetary reward such a verdict would likely produce, but also for the just recognition you will receive for your outstanding legal work on behalf of your clients. I hope it leads to other important and ground breaking securities litigation. Thank you very much for your hard work on our behalf. Thanks and Kudos.

[mimurray]

Outstanding!!

Thank you for all your hard work.

[studythosestocks]

My goodness that is well written. Thank you so much from all of us shareholders and those who can benefit from Vascepa.

Now we wait but not without a Herculean effort by you and others here

Thank you AGAIN for sharing your talents for the benefit of many fighting for justice.

[FlyFishingStocks]

Thank you Marjac. Your reply is so well thought out, organized and precise. Loved all the supporting citations!

[alm2]

Marjac
Got to say that is a legal masterpiece ..

..Hikma gave you the opportunity to reinforce your case and you sure took it -they shot themselves in the foot and so many times

It gave you the opportunity to really lay out and again what Heinke did and what the court were taken in by

It is incredibly compelling

It is clearly outside any legal reason or logic for this petition to be denied
Alm

[Jasbg]

marjac@ This magnificent Answer Brief 'Rings all the way to Europe'.

As alm2 points out 'they opened the door for you' - and you stepped In - Filling the Opening completely - rolling out almost the entire case.

Brilliant.

At one point afraid you would run out of Ink - but that surely didn't happen :)

Jasbg

[ziploc_1]

Marjac...This paragraph is our most compelling argument in the reply
"Because the Judgment Invalidating Amarin’s Patents was Procured By Fraud, and EPADI II’s Interests have been Directly Affected, EPADI II has Standing."

Thank you for your excellent work for all of us in EPADI II

[rosemountbomber]

Marjac, I have to echo everyone’s sentiments. You have spun a masterpiece and left no question unanswered. Bravo

[Invest83838]

Thank You Marjac

for what you are doing for AMRN investors

HIKMA and their lawyers are terrible but so are AMRN Management, since they are doing little for AMRN investors and are only lining their pockets periodically by awarding themselves and selling their free shares

[hypo]

WOW!....A lovely marvelous road map of the details.
Hypo

[Robert C Jonson]

Nicely done,Marjac, thanks! I do have one question: Can you declare fraud was done if it hasn’t been proven? It seems to me the fraud you declare should be stated as alleged. Am I mistaken? Thanks, Bob.

[eightisenough]

marj-wow! a masterpiece, Waxman couldn't have done better. As you said it must be heaven sent, that amrn didn't make the motion--to allow you the performance.

Par excellence!!!

9

[noelan_s09]

Thank your you Marjac! This board and Amarin is so fortunate to have you as an investor.

[couldbebetter]

Marjac, Any way we could get you on the BOD?

The shareholders owe you, BIGTIME!
The management team should reward you in some tangible way.
This may not be on your radar right now, but I hope if the
opportunity arises you would pursue it.
Rather than us disgruntled shareholders complain endlessly
seeking your representation on the BOD might be more productive
and very satisfying.

Thank you for placing your heart, mind, and soul into this effort!

[BobWayne]

Wonderful Marjac, I hope we finally get justice for all our pain and suffering! Thank you so much for your efforts!!

[rafunrafun]

Thanks, Marjac. A fascinating next step would be for Du to order Amarin to respond to your allegations.

I realize that they already responded with basically "no comment" but if Du is really concerned that she was hoodwinked and is not comfortable with hearing it from the investors, she may order (or just ask) Amarin to comment to the substance of your allegations.

Marjac + Amarin would be an interesting alliance.

[MA52TA]

Great MARJAC.
THANK YOU!

[gozips]

Outstanding brief, Marjac, thank you and the team for your efforts...now to discover if Du has a brain and a conscience.

[ralphey]

Outstanding Job Marjac! Excellent summary .... David vs Goliath ...and we know who won that won ...

[ratna1]

Thank you Marjac & Team for your relentless defence of your fellow shareholders. Just out of pure self interest let me request from you that you do take a day or two off to spent with family and friends and/or go out all alone into nature without a timetable to replenish yourself!
If you have done that would you adress my personal pet concern (with all due prejudice that your online posts are certainly monitored by Hikma counsel) which is wether a victory in your motion 60 (if the court recognizes that it has been defrauded) would open the door to civil damages litigation?
If a case of fraud would be established by Judge Du's decision would this establish Hikmas strategy to be a criminal act ?
Thus could it be that this would constitute "tortious / wrongful / malicious interference" against shareholders interests in the company?
Would that allow for a class action suit being brought against Hikma seeking redress for losses resulting from their criminal interference with bad intent?
I for one basically lost my retirement already depleted by punishing medical expenses capped by my insurer...
I am sure others on this board would show even larger losses to constitute for a class