InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

marjac

04/10/21 11:52 AM

#334294 RE: ratna1 #334286

rat, I have some ideas, have preliminarily lined up skilled co-counsel, have opened preliminary files, and have contingency plans on potential civil damages remedies for what happened on 3/30. The pursuit of such remedies are enormous undertakings and are very complicated. But I believe that based upon the work done to date, we have established credibility, and a seriousness of purpose.

As to what remedies can be pursued against what parties, it remains a work in progress, very much dependent upon what major events transpire over the next few months, including not limited to, what happens with the SCOTUS, the disposition of the Rule 60, the Delaware litigation, and especially whether the company is bought out.

One thing is for sure, I will not be saying anything negative about the company, management, its lawyers, and especially Judge Du for the foreseeable future. I prefer alliances over adversarial relationships unless there is no other choice. There have been times I have wanted to chime in on some very interesting discussions here on the Board, but have refrained to exclusively focus on the task at hand, which is still a very challenging task.

Right now, I am laser focused on winning the Rule 60. It is the only objective, the only thing that matters to me. I am driven to prove the doubters and skeptics wrong. I am driven to make maximum use of facts, law, evidence, math, and science, to correct the injustice that has transpired.

We are going into a battle against a tough and determined adversary. I can't promise that I will bring home victory. But this I swear before you and Almight God: That when we go into battle, I will be the first to set foot on the field, and I will be the last to step off. And we will leave no argument behind. Victorious or defeated, we will all move forward together.