News Focus
News Focus
icon url

harrypothead

10/23/03 10:44 PM

#28215 RE: otraque #28208

ALL REPUBLICANS NOT CREATED EQUAL
By Bill Gallagher
Niagara Falls Reporter


DETROIT -- Our nation and the world would be far better off with the Republicans in charge. No, I haven't taken leave of my senses. I want the Republicans back in power instead of the Texas Republicans, the crazy crowd that runs the White House and dominates the Congress.

Texas Republicans created an unnecessary war, made Americans despised around the world and our nation less secure, attacked basic civil and human rights, lost millions of jobs, made the rich richer and the poor poorer, left 40 million Americans without health insurance, defiled the environment, created record deficits and fiscal chaos, debased political discourse and twisted democratic institutions.

The Republican Party of the 19th and 20th centuries stood for good and decent things, and the party produced many able presidents and congressional leaders who changed America for the better. The Texas Republican party of George W. Bush has as much in common with the party of Abraham Lincoln as the ACLU does with the Ku Klux Klan.

George W. Bush and his "brain," top political adviser Karl Rove, took Texas Republican politics to the national and international stage. The damage they've already done will take decades to undo.

Unlike the more broadly based traditional Republican party, Texas Republicanism has a narrow but politically effective base -- the hard-core extremist Christian right-wingers and the corporate and businesses interests whose only real ideology is money.

The religious right provides the political foot soldiers, and the pulpits of righteousness and the corporations fund the campaigners. Karl Rove developed this winning formula in state campaigns in Texas and now uses it nationally.

Texas Republicans like to call themselves conservatives, but they really are not. No true conservative would tolerate the deficits, the assault on the Bill of Rights, the protectionist tariffs on foreign steel and the shameless subsidies and corporate welfare the Bush administration fosters.

They just figure that, if they constantly refer to themselves as conservatives, people will buy it. So far, they generally do. Just say you're for the Ten Commandments in schools, limited rights for gays, the death penalty, guns everywhere and tax cuts, and favor a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution, and people won't look carefully at those other telling issues.

Much of the impetus for the Texas Republican brand of vile politics came from Rush Limbaugh, the admitted druggie who used the airwaves to create an atmosphere of intolerance, exclusion and distrust.

The fact that he was usually high or seeking highs from street-drug merchants explains much of his distorted thinking, and those under his spell must now examine all the shallow rhetoric they bought into with such blind faith. Limbaugh, as influential as he was dope-crazed, helped spawn the radical right's seizure of the Republican Party.

Newt Gingrich accelerated that process and effectively silenced moderate voices in the Republican congressional leadership. He led his forces to control of the House with the well-marketed, but thoroughly fraudulent, "Contract with America."

Newt claimed the Republicans were "idea-driven," but, in fact, he spent most of his time as speaker of the House as an angry, shrill voice of divisiveness, attacking anything the Democrats or President Clinton advanced.

Gingrich's hubris and the public's disgust with his vituperative style led to his fall from power, but his bitter resentment and vision of the Republican Party as a club for the radical right lives on in the person of Tom DeLay, the House majority leader from Texas.

DeLay, who's Newt Gingrich without the charm, actually runs the House. Speaker Dennis Hastert is a mere figurehead. He takes all his cues from DeLay, an iron-fisted political thug who sees government and the Republican Party as instruments to protect and enhance private interests. The broader public good never enters DeLay's mind.

The former exterminator did inhale a considerable volume of pesticides while driving cockroaches out of the slums of Houston. The long-term effect of chemicals on his mind, like the drugs on Limbaugh's, brings a medical dimension to their political views.

DeLay leans shamelessly on big-money interests to pay dues to the Republican Party. He practices legal extortion with impunity and rewards those who kick in, based solely on campaign donations and promises of political support.

DeLay practices the politics of the religious right -- that's Christian minus the beatitudes -- and he uses his power to advance every wacko extremist position imaginable. The few moderate voices in the Republican Senate have no chance getting anything past DeLay.

The Senate version of the $87 billion for the colonial tab in Iraq includes a provision to provide some of that money in the form of long-term loans. Reasonable enough, thought the Republican moderates, but George W. will have no part of that and he can play hardball, knowing full well fellow Texas Republican DeLay will kill the loan provision in conference. These guys think compromise is a sin.

Looking at the pantheon of 20th-century Republican leaders, most of them would, at least, be uncomfortable, and many of them would be run right out of the Texas Republican party. Teddy Roosevelt, for sure. His passion for nature and national parks would be a big strike against him. Toss that in with his attacks on monopolies and child labor and his support of multinationalism, and old T.R. would be booed in Crawford, Texas.

Dwight Eisenhower was the quintessential moderate. He built the interstate highway system -- imagine using public money for infrastructure improvements instead of tax cuts for the wealthy.

Ike sent federal troops to Little Rock, Ark., to enforce desegregation. He didn't like the Supreme Court's decision integrating public schools, but he saw it as his duty to carry out the court's ruling.

Eisenhower's greatest offense to Texas Republicanism was his wise warning of the dangers of the "military-industrial complex," a phrase he coined. The Bush administration is beyond cozy with military contractors. It's a full partnership, a seamless garment of collusion that would make Ike sick.

Barry Goldwater -- "Mr. Conservative" and the 1964 Republican presidential candidate -- would find the Patriot Act repugnant, the Bush deficits an abomination and the Texas Republican social agenda intolerant.

Richard Nixon, crook that he was, did some very good things. Nixon signed the law creating the Environmental Protection Agency and supported federal revenue-sharing with state and local governments.

On the international scene, Nixon brought China into the community of nations and sought to engage the Soviet Union. Bush and his Texas gang always choose war and confrontation over engagement. Iran, North Korea and Syria are demonized, driving them into more isolation and creating greater threats. Bully is better, say the Texans.

Bush is even rattling his sabers at Cuba in a disgracefully transparent ploy to win votes in Florida. Even Nixon would have more sense that that.

Gerald Ford was a healer with a gentle manner. The Texas Republicans would consider him "soft."

During the economic downturn, Ford supported the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act, a program whereby the federal government funded hundreds of thousands of public service jobs, immediately pumping billions of dollars into the economy and helping people find work. Ford didn't think big tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans was the way to get the economy moving.

Ronald Reagan ended the arms race with the Soviet Union and said we had to trust our old enemies in the long, costly Cold War. The neocons who now shape the foreign policy for the Texas Republicans did not support Reagan's bold and courageous initiative that gave the world hope for peace.

Even the president's daddy, an essentially moderate man, doesn't fit the bill for Texas Republicans. In his book, "The World Transformed," George H.W. Bush wrote of the dangers he saw in deciding not to occupy Iraq after the Gulf War. "We should not march into Baghdad. To occupy Iraq would instantly shatter our coalition, turning the whole Arab world against us and making a broken tyrant into a latter-day Arab hero. Assigning young soldiers to a fruitless hunt for a securely entrenched dictator and condemning them to fight what would be an unwinnable urban guerrilla war, it could only plunge that part of the world into even greater instability," Bush the Elder prophetically noted.

Let's turn to Texas and be thankful for so much -- Molly Ivans, Dennis Quaid, Dwight Eisenhower, Nolan Ryan, Willie Nelson, Janice Joplin and the beloved Dixie Chicks. We need more Texans like them. Let's hope the Texas Republican party and its leaders fade into political oblivion, and honorable Republicans regain control of a great party that once served the nation so well.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

icon url

goodluck

10/23/03 11:58 PM

#28221 RE: otraque #28208

Hero: Ritter Was Right
By Carl F. Worden

[This is a blog entry. Thanks to Bilow on SI for the link.]

Scott Ritter was right all along. That former Marine and Weapons Inspector has got more redeeming character, personal integrity and raw courage, than just about anyone in America. In my mind, he ranks right up there with Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore, who has been suspended ten days for refusing to remove the Ten Commandments from the entrance to the Alabama Supreme Court, and former Army Specialist Michael New, who got drummed out of the Army for correctly refusing to wear United Nations insignia.

Our children are not being taught what a real hero is anymore. They are not being taught right from wrong, let alone trained to use those unwavering principles to make correct, everyday personal decisions. Only real heroes do that. It doesn’t matter to heroes how many others ridicule and try to shout them down. They have the basic Laws of God written into their hearts, they know right from wrong, truth from lies, and they stand up for what they know is right because they know God Himself is standing right behind them. Frankly, they don’t need anybody else.


Such is the person of Scott Ritter, who appeared on Fox’s Geraldo Rivera segment August 24th. Ritter has been hammered repeatedly for his stand against the war on Iraq, primarily because he insisted Iraq didn’t have the weapons of mass destruction the Bush Administration claimed it did. He has been accused of collusion with Saddam Hussein, and investigated to suggest Saddam paid him off. Everything, including the kitchen sink has been thrown at Ritter to shut him up, but like one of those old-style punching bags, he just keeps popping right back up.


Well, Ritter did it again last night. Geraldo interviewed Ritter at the same time as a gaggle of soldiers stationed in Iraq, and a retired general whose name I can’t recall at the moment.


You have to appreciate Geraldo’s set-up. There’s this group of soldiers standing like deer in the headlights, knowing full well that if they question the necessity of the war, complain about their atrocious living conditions and lack of supplies, food, personnel and equipment, lament the occupation and their mounting dead, or anything else that could possibly be construed as criticism, their military careers will be road kill. Okay, so we already know what they’re going to say.


Then there’s the retired general, who appears regularly on Fox to give his analysis of the military goings on in Iraq – and we know he doesn’t do it for free.


So we’ve got this one gutsy guy named Scott Ritter facing another virtual firing squad, and standing up to them with complete confidence that he’ll walk away unscathed. He pulled it off just like he always has before – only this time he had a lot more backing his position than he ever did before the war commenced: Now he has the hard proof.


Ritter made it clear from the onset that he emphatically supported the troops, and that they had done an excellent job as ordered. He also stated our troops should be brought home immediately.


Ritter correctly stated that this was a war “elected” by President Bush (read without a congressional declaration) on the basis that there was an imminent threat by Saddam to use weapons of mass destruction against America and her allies. He pointed out that in lieu of such a threat, the war had been unnecessary – just as he’d warned all along – and that the United States should pull out of Iraq immediately and let the people of Iraq have their nation back. Ritter also pointed out quite succinctly that because no imminent threat from Iraq actually existed, then by default, our attack on Iraq was an act of naked aggression.


Duh.


Naturally, when Geraldo interviewed the soldiers, they made nice and said they were oh-so happy to have helped “liberate” the people of Iraq from mean old Saddam. One said he joined the military to “serve his country” and was proud to do it. Unlike Michael New, he had apparently forgotten that he is sworn to serve his country within the confines of the Constitution and his oath.


The retired general was just a pom-pom girl for anything our soldiers are ever ordered to do, congressionally declared or not, constitutional or not and legal or not, just like a lot of our brain-dead flag-waving citizens whose enthusiasm for war and killing has been noticeably muted of late.


Scott Ritter won that little debate hands down. Real heroes always do.


By the way, we’ve captured most of the “Deck of Cards” in Iraq now, and not one of those high-ranking officers has cut a deal for themselves by pointing out where those WMDs are hidden. What, not one? The inevitable offer of wealth and immunity in a nice safe place anywhere they want to go, and no takers? Trust me, if they knew, they’d be talking. Bush can’t keep this fat lie alive much longer. Ritter was right all along: Saddam didn’t have weapons of mass destruction – at least not anymore.


If you really want to know how our soldiers are doing in Iraq, don’t waste your time watching staged interviews with intimidated soldiers on CNN and Fox. Get the straight scoop from the horse’s mouths by logging on to hero David Hackworth’s Website.

Hackworth is a trusted friend of the military grunt, and he is collecting numerous letters from some very angry soldiers stuck in the quagmire of Iraq.


Take note of the fact our soldiers are so poorly equipped that they are taking up confiscated AK-47 assault rifles because they have more confiscated ammunition for those rifles than they have issued to them for their M-16s. They’ve found the AK-47 to be far more reliable than the M-16, and the AK is superior in close quarters battle.

To my hero Michael New: Had you not stood up for what was right, you might also be partaking of the plagues of Iraq yourself. Excellent choice! I hope that message rings in the ears of those gutless cowards now stationed in Iraq who would not stand with you.

Carl F. Worden

http://www.sierratimes.com/03/08/27/carlworden.htm