Replies to post #672011 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Chronic The Hemp Hog]

I get that it is a rebuttal but its date on the letter that irks me. It means more delay because this letter was just submitted. I agree makes it look more and more illegal what the government is doing but when you have been waiting for a decision from the SCOTUS and then see this letter you know it isn't going to happen right away if correspondence like this is still flying around.

[RickNagra]

I am glad this letter mentions the liquidation preference. Pound the message home to the Supremes.

[stockprofitter]

FHFA & Treasury now legally exposed. Good stuff.

[EternalPatience]

I like the punch line at the end in paranthesis (SENATE CONFIRMED)

thats a cheeky Jab

[gazerbeam]

Love It!

[trunkmonk]

Yup. Their words are much better stated than mine, I have stated the same thing, and it shows the greed and lack of any intent to conserve, and even blocks the ability of FHFA to accomplish anything. SCOTUS may not consider it, but they sure are smart enough to see though old slippery one SM.

[Robert from yahoo bd]

Nice! Given the governments virtually unlimited resources and refusal to take ANY responsibility for their bad acts, this truly is a story of David v Goliath!

[trunkmonk]

SM also purposely harmed shareholders in the process. It was a last minute jab with no notification or collaboration. Mark Noncollaboration was also doing a 180 and telling shareholders to not only turn the other cheek but is sounding an alarm to make himself needed in hopes of keeping his job.