Replies to post #242697 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[allspice]

The co told you to not rely on its past PRs. The cement deal to which you refer was in a past PR. The co said "not to rely upon the press releases and other public statements previously issued by or on behalf of the Company."

[rookeeper]

Did you factor in:

The OSC trading suspension.
The upcoming SEC suspension.
The millions being spent on lawyers.
The millions that will be spent on lawsuits.
The fact that there is no audit showing anything.
The fact that no one even knows what company
or shell that they own shares in.

[16novem]

uw86 - what is it that you don't understand?

there is no $1.25 billion cement deal

just like

there never was a closed $350 million revenue per year cement deal

wake up!



Posted by: uw86
In reply to: massconfusion who wrote msg# 242695 Date: 1/12/2007 9:43:34 AM
Post # of 242860

check my earler posts; went through the numbers- you can easily attain pps of over .10 IF the cement deal is legit--and it would not be non-recurring as some suggested then--all assumes a base biz apart from current inquiry--mo only