News Focus
News Focus
icon url

eliaman

01/12/07 9:33 AM

#242691 RE: uw86 #242688

well..sbsh bid is .004 and are now asking .005
icon url

stockplayazz

01/12/07 9:39 AM

#242694 RE: uw86 #242688

As much as I would love to see some deals pr'd, I have a feeling that we won't be hearing much from the company for a good while. I don't thank that gag order will be lifted for a some time. I truly hope I'm wrong and I think we all deserve answers.
icon url

massconfusion

01/12/07 9:39 AM

#242695 RE: uw86 #242688

What's your basis for that statement, uw? Fact is that you have no idea what the balance sheet and operating statements of SLJB look line, and therefore have no idea of what its value, if any, might be.

And you can forget the 12 to 1 thingee. This company (whatever the hell the company is) is terminal.
icon url

Tuslog28

01/12/07 10:10 AM

#242723 RE: uw86 #242688

valued/undervalued...doesn't make any difference at when a company has flaky management and has been on a pump and dump program.
icon url

16novem

01/12/07 1:10 PM

#242857 RE: uw86 #242688

uw86 - and would that be the $1.25 billion cement deal that was announce by SLJB in a Dec. 11th press release as "closed", then a few paragraphs into the text it said the in reality the deal was not really closed because banking statements of the buyer have not been provided yet, but that this would occur in only a few days?

that one?




Posted by: uw86
In reply to: None Date: 1/12/2007 9:32:47 AM
Post # of 242851

the market cap of SLJB is quite undervalued imo--if the 12/11 deal is confirmed it will be especially pronounced