News Focus
News Focus
icon url

stockplayazz

01/11/07 4:11 PM

#242314 RE: janice shell #242310

I believe something that come out in the past couple of days, maybe from the osc even, mentioned them as "affiliates".
icon url

BerryBuck

01/11/07 4:16 PM

#242320 RE: janice shell #242310

imo everyone in the co. management is dirty. steve is probably trying to act like he knows nothing of the shares being sold. he is guilty by letting that freaky looking petard anywhere near the company to begin with imo. what a joke.
icon url

16novem

01/11/07 4:32 PM

#242338 RE: janice shell #242310

janice - the best conclusion that can be made at this point in time form all of the company and OSC documents that have been made public is that the public company trading with the symbol SLJB, which is the Sulja Nevada described earlier and which is the entity that is owned by the public stockholders, owns between 1% and 49% of Sulja Bros Ontario, the entity that owns the lumberyards.



A great deal depends on whether Sulja Nevada and Sulja Ontario are one and the same. If not, Sulja Ontario will simply carry on as a private company in which the shareholders will have no interest.

It's been said that Sulja Nevada does have "an interest" in Sulja Ontario. It would be good to have that clarified.