News Focus
News Focus
icon url

AZCowboy

01/29/21 9:35 AM

#647120 RE: woodstock_guy25 #647117

~ I Totally Agree 100%', This Environment IS and Has Been Absolutely Outrageous' ~

The Unbridled Use of the SEC Allowances' to accomplish the "process" to where WE' are ? is absolutely shameful ... As I have posted, I have a tremendous amount of "past" litigation experience (I sold my business in 2020, and always as a defendant, (never, never, never, a plaintiff') now with all that owed me for their losses having paid up) ... I have moved on from those days' ...

ridiculously, poor court room litigation skills, coupled with sloppy and poorly research material, done by the coffee lady (jp contractor) and promoters have NOT BEEN Helpful' ... on top of all else' what we did not need was any more continued delays' ... The Original WMI Preferred Managing Subsidiary', now a WMIH Preferred Managing Subsidiary, is and has been listed on the SEC site' ... both then' and now' ...

anyway;

the Asset Values of WMIH (and its Subsidiaries) are obviously very real, ... the 2nd Ownership Change, ... the 2nd Private Rights Offering, ... as well as the 2nd Issuing of "Secondary Dilutive Share's" ...

The acknowledgement and accounting for the entire WMIH Corporate Structure will be realized, or ? as the Asset Values', shown in the Second Private Rights Offering, there are many institutions that were lied to or mislead at minimum, and have thrown millions of dollars away for zero' ... That ? is NOT THE Case' ... Nope Not Hardly'

~ Everyone', Institution and Individual Alike, Waits At The Exact Very Same Time' ~

AZ



icon url

SamuraiProgrammer

01/29/21 9:36 AM

#647121 RE: woodstock_guy25 #647117

About Naked Short Selling being illegal

This should be 100 illegal.



IT IS

Specifically

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) banned the practice of naked short selling in the United States in 2008 after the financial crisis. The ban applies to naked shorting only and not to other short-selling activities.

Prior to this ban, the SEC amended Regulation SHO to limit possibilities for naked shorting by removing loopholes that existed for some brokers and dealers in 2007. Regulation SHO requires lists to be published that track stocks with unusually high trends in failing to deliver (FTD) shares.



The problem is that the SEC is apparently unwilling to do anything about it.

Can anyone point to an action by the SEC that actually involved intervention?

icon url

PickStocks

01/29/21 9:57 AM

#647133 RE: woodstock_guy25 #647117

At the same time, some individuals rose the prices, talking about example GameStop. Now most could not catch-up and profit from this but we can with options as it goes down. Same thing was down with amc. Just these two are not sustainable at the high price.
icon url

mypenneys

01/29/21 2:20 PM

#647173 RE: woodstock_guy25 #647117

They need to stop short selling more than the shares outstanding maybe then need to cut it in half of outstanding shares. Definitely Illegal.