I think that only Justice Sotomayor had doubts, because she stated in a question to the appellant that the third amendment was "a valid or a reasonable business decision to be entered into". Also she told the attorney that she was reluctant to grant remedies and she only wants to strike the "for cause" removal protection. Maybe she was just the one chosen among the Justices to play the role of devil's advocate, but later the decision will be unanimous.
They need time to figure out how to justify their ruling that the nationalization of two companies is, in fact, legal. I don't trust SCOTUS to make the legally correct and non-political decision here one iota.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
