Replies to post #10823 on CYIOS Corporation (CYIO)

[wodehouse]

Great summation and insightful comments. Looking forward to part two. Oh if only this was another Tesla!

[rs99]

Hey bud, there is no way this was $1.24 on the last day in March 2020. The high for the last year was .14! I would have sold and been a fairly wealthy man had it hit $1.24.

[NorthTrail]

Thanks for posting Axle:

1) there is a sec document approving a merger plan between CYIO and Helio (if I read you correctly)?

2) there are lots of shells Helio could have RMd with, so - why CYIO? My opinion is, CYIO/Helio would look to be a lender to mj cos globally, specifically MJ cos importing product and having offtake agreements with TXTM, which is headed by CYIO CEO David Lewis, and which has signed a joint venture w private global specialized MJ extract provider, @RSAMMD. Do you think this is feasible? Access to Helio's crypto lending could be synergistic; ie attractive to mj cos unable to get traditional funding. Helio would continue general lending to tech, etc. txtm would provide patents and possibly public co status to @RSAMMD. Both cyio and txtm would benefit. I'm long txtm. like cyio too but low on cash.

GLTA and happy new year

jmo

[Axle-and-Hub]

12-31-20 part 2 of 2 on CYIO

3. Well I'm half way thru my thoughts on my current ownership of CYIO stock.

Readers need to understand that I've been a long term holder of CYIO stock going back maybe 12 or more years. While there were opportunities to merely buy and sell in the earlier years using CYIO as a "channeling stock" the last number of years it became something different. Every stock has strength and weaknesses - and CYIO just didn't have "the energy" the last 5 or 6 years prior to 2020.

I couldn't see how it was building more success than what they'd already sold the Military. And it appeared the company was using all its income simply to support management and a few employees. And if there was dilution - it wasn't now - it was then in my opinion. And "the lawsuit" just wasn't an inspired idea - it was a defense not meant to defend public shareholders - again in my opinion.

One of the things I appreciated in later 2019 and early 2020 - was the SEC's considerable efforts to do no harm to the public shareholders yet separate the victims from the "cause" of the problems. The SEC isn't known for gentle elimination - yet I could sense it was happening (and remember this DID involve protecting the military too). Allowing us to keep the public shell after the sale of the software product/shell/client was a real key to my thinking. And it gave someone an opportunity to "prove themselves worthy".

O'Shea and Lewis et. al. had considerable work to do proving themselves worthy getting past financial years and then past quarters pieced back together and properly filed and then approved. This was not some simple easy activity . . . its like going thru a full audit for each year period and each of the prior year quarters - and this is "The SEC" by the way reviewing the effort.

I believed from their 1st updated filing - there were much easier (and faster) ways to acquire a public small company. I believe the SEC was actively looking for errors - and this "smart mind" behind it knew that deliberately.

But that's history. And I certainly don't say everything is perfectly done. As a shareholder - I'd like to see the share price higher before a merger might happen - because that is exactly how shareholders "share" and it makes it less dilutive and more shareholder friendly. So naturally a "smart mind" created a way to help that - if the share price rises - our stock is more valuable - but so is their's (stock in CYIO). Again - to me - this tells me that "smart mind" knows the SEC is still watching.

I'd have liked to see some added clever methods for CYIO to have gotten more timely activity going with our Sanitizing products. I won't detail my ideas - but there have been and still are some timely things left undone in my opinion while the merger potentially starts to develop (if and when it does).

But in general - I compare this to some trends we used to see by large companies - except its reversed. Remember TYCO and GE in 1999 and 2000 - they amassed lots of smaller companies and shells and because of their existing size - those new companies gained greater value almost overnight - increasing TYCO and GE financial strength. And CYIO is just the reverse - and tiny tiny tiny public company struggling to recover for its shareholders - potentially merger 1st with Choice Wellness and then developing some "no cost" licensed products with good technology and public value to others - and then - maybe - just maybe - just maybe - merging with another larger "technical lending" company of a unique type currently not competing in these United States and fully legal and accepted in a country of our good friend Australia.

4. Do I think that 2021 is a year of rose colored glasses and fairy tale dreams? Absolutely not. But with the stock price approximately the same as 12 months ago - I think we are sitting on a very very interesting 2021 for shareholders. But you have to see "the view" - not any guarantees. The Packers aren't guaranteed to beat the Bears Sunday - and if they thought they were - they would surely lose. But with CYIO you have to "see" what takes effort to see. As an example - in July of 2020 CYIO announced their 24 products and sanitizing products in a formal manner. on Wednesday - and the market responded on that Wednesday and Thursday and part of Friday. But then a whole different trading pattern happened on that following Monday, Tuesday and part of Wednesday. I don't believe they were related - because the volume that following Mon, Tues. and part of Wed, were far far larger and more aggressive volumes - even some pre market activity. My point is this - 2 different responses means 2 different efforts and potentially 2 different markets reacting to 2 different things. My humble opinion is - there is a 2nd shareholder interest market that has not yet been tapped at all - and that doesn't include the potential new merger potential too.

But posters will be posters - and some will try to pump and some will try to deflate either to swing trade or defeat - and then there are the more important 3rd category ones who know how to interpret real facts when shown the "visions" that could actually exist. Remember - I believe the SEC is still following along - so far it appears we've had their approval - we want to continue that with creativity and finding opportunities that others haven't considered and avoid the crowds of flocking competitors. We don't want to be a "me too" operation.

All of both posts are just my opinion and viewpoints for 2021 based on what we've seen publicly.

P.S. Please don't expect me to share my methods of what could be done.