News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jerseyboy

01/05/07 1:12 PM

#236146 RE: FattyMcButterpants #236145

Absolutely correct, and a viewpoint that is neither expressed nor considered very often here, but is very valid and accurate.
icon url

gdb81

01/05/07 1:16 PM

#236149 RE: FattyMcButterpants #236145

I don't disagree people will buy, that longs won't add to their positions, that new longs won't be attracted to the stock if they verify some deals and come up with AFs.

The stock will go up undoubtably, but not nearly to the levels some people are hoping for, because they are missing the truth of this situation: the circumstances and assumptions in the share structure and ownership structure that made those levels realistic just two months ago now no longer exist.


icon url

janice shell

01/05/07 4:04 PM

#236274 RE: FattyMcButterpants #236145

this is pinkyland. people put their money in stocks that are undervalued regardless of past history.

In the Pinks, generally people put their money in stocks that are overvalued or just plain worthless, hoping for a run.

Some here seem to believe SLJB and its principals will be exonerated at Monday's hearing. I think the chances of that are very slim indeed. More likely, the company's representatives will ask for more time to make some kind of pleading. That request will be granted, the cease trade order will be extended, and a new hearing date will be set.