News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BigBadWolf

11/03/20 11:32 AM

#53000 RE: NM1978 #52999

hell(o) that's EZ to answer, any shareholder or potential one can view the SOS filing(s)
icon url

Peepson

11/03/20 11:33 AM

#53001 RE: NM1978 #52999

A/S could of been ok, the dilution may of killed the deal. What would be purpose would adding shares to the o/s?
icon url

MNK3240

11/03/20 11:34 AM

#53003 RE: NM1978 #52999

Business deals are different, everything goes by formal agreement and stuff. Recently, PASO said the discussions are in an ongoing state, a simple english, meaning nothing is final yet.

If things are not final, would you do something your other partner tells you to do, in this case increasing o/s share by 400m from the last count, which is almost 50% increase over the previous 750m o/s.

It changes the control equation for CLX as well. I don't believe for a second that PASO is listening to CLX or JG before signing DA.

Remember, CLX asked for extension, not by PASO. PASO was always willing to close it on Jul 15, it was CLX who deferred the DD, not PASO.

So if anyone is to blame for is JG and CLX, not PASO.

I am not saying RM is not gonna happen but like BBW said, it is rare that o/s share increase before a formal signed DA (that so over 400m, not a small amount), no matter what.
icon url

serious38

11/03/20 11:44 AM

#53009 RE: NM1978 #52999

No doubt about that: JG knew about the increase. Let's hope JG does not disappoint.