Replies to post #97183 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[VVVVVV]

No problem.

Previously, Koh set the Second Alice hearing for claims construction, then cancelled it, and dismissed the case, without hearing the claims.

With the recent ‘606, VPLM has asked to dismiss the case in Northern California and Apples is saying it’s similar to the previously dismissed ‘815/‘005 patents, therefore it should be heard in Koh’s Court and not Waco.

So, who knows exactly what it means terminating the recent hearing, which most thought was to argue a dismissal and or to argue to have it tried in her court, in Northern California.

Could it be she’ll decide to continue the lawsuit in Northern California or dismiss the case. I don’t see any evidence that indicates which way she’ll go. Although, all longs are hoping there’s a pattern in her actions, that would indicate a dismissal. IMHO, that’s wishful thinking and not fact. Hence, the 20% increase in today’s PPS. IMHO it’ll be short lived and PPS will weaken.