News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Roach58

10/14/20 10:56 PM

#636176 RE: AZCowboy #636164

Thanks, how about as they(16's) relate to the p's & k's? ..any calculable comparison there, as they(p,k) at one time had a known value?
icon url

Roach58

10/14/20 11:23 PM

#636179 RE: AZCowboy #636164

I'm asking because the settling piers that got capped at around $10.60/share returned for my position over 3X roi, so I just wanted to do a little fantasy math.
icon url

xoom

10/15/20 9:18 AM

#636191 RE: AZCowboy #636164

Thanks AZ.

Thoughts on this “unnamed” JPM legacy investment/impairment ?



which is notable because when compared to the "monstrous growth" of the bank’s deposit-gathering operation, it drops JPMorgan’s loans-to-deposits ratio to just 49%, the first time in recent quarters it’s fallen below the 50% threshold according to Bloomberg. This is a closely watched metric that measures how much lending a bank is doing when compared to its capacity to lend.

There was an interesting disclosure in the bank's Corporate division, where it noted a $719MM expense, driven by an "impairment" on an unnamed legacy investment.



https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/dimon-signals-all-clear-jpmorgan-earnings-smash-expectations-loss-provisions-plummet-94