News Focus
News Focus
icon url

snips007

12/29/06 3:17 PM

#229641 RE: hikeandblock #229635

correct we are not done till the fat lady sings
icon url

yeah_sure

12/29/06 3:18 PM

#229646 RE: hikeandblock #229635

Green-they didn't "agree" to a public hearing. It's part of their SOP. Ya know, that due process thingee in English and US law.

And yes, they have a slam dunk. They clearly subpoenaed the trading and bank records.
icon url

waltczyk

12/29/06 3:19 PM

#229653 RE: hikeandblock #229635

that is the only positive in all of this, not much of a positive but...................

or maybe they are just buying time as they want to hear it from petar and company directly

not sure how this works
icon url

janice shell

12/29/06 4:42 PM

#229977 RE: hikeandblock #229635

OSC does not have a slam dunk here at all. Look, they already amended their own order to halt this and agreed to a public hearing.

What? There's always a public hearing.
icon url

Jim Bishop

12/29/06 6:28 PM

#230165 RE: hikeandblock #229635

There's always a public hearing....don't be mistaken, the OSC and RCMP don't just head into these things willy nilly without evidence. This one is looking like a slam dunk.

Trading records for example...how do think they came up with the $7.8 million in trading proceeds? "From or about September 2004 to August 2005, Vucicevich set up trading accounts at two Canadian discount brokers using employees of Kore and/or members of the Sulja family as nominees (the “Nominee Accounts”"

Testimony from KPMG and PWC...."The representations made in the press releases described above are untrue. Neither KPMG nor PWC have or have had any involvement with Sulja Bros"

Testimony from Transfer Online...."Between August 2006 and November 2006, Vucicevich and DeVries directed trading in the Nominee Accounts as follows: Sulja Nevada shares were received in large quantities into the Nominee Accounts by journal entry from Transfer Online, a transfer agent in Portland, Oregon, and were thereafter sold from the Nominee Accounts."

"The shares were received into the Nominee Accounts from Sulja Nevada’s treasury either directly or through Kore. In both circumstances, the trading constituted a distribution which requires in each instance the issuance of a prospectus receipt by the Commission for the securities of Sulja Nevada or a proper exemption under Ontario securities law. No such receipt has been issued nor have the Respondents demonstrated the existence of a proper exemption from the requirement, contrary to section 53 of the Act.


Testimony quite possibly from someone(s) that has/have flipped on Petar and Devries...."Vucicevich and De Vries instructed the account holders of the Nominee Accounts when to trade, at what price to trade, and how many shares to trade at a given price."




icon url

janniebgood

12/30/06 2:17 AM

#230631 RE: hikeandblock #229635

I'll assure you that OSC is very confident in its evidence and proof of the allegations or it would not have made a formal public complaint. Securities regulatory agencies such as OSC and the SEC pretty much ensure they can prove their allegations before ever making them. The order will most likely be amended at the hearing to EXTEND the prohibition on trading the stock in Canada.