Ah, I see what you saying. Those are very good points. There have been times when I thought some of FCEL's published statements of their intentions were possibly dishonest or misleading, but I didn't dwell on that idea. Thank you very much for clarifying.
I am reminded of the transcript of the Q2 FY2020 conference call in which FCEL executives/directors seemed to be saying (or implying) that the maintenance costs which resulted in the generation gross margin being a loss would not happen again (to the extent of generation costs exceeding generation revenues), yet it happened in Q3 FY2020 anyway.
Maybe FCEL allowed the various underwriting companies to do short selling, even naked short selling, so they would be more inclined to underwrite FCEL's offering - even though the short selling would hurt many FCEL investors.
I guess I should start reading some of FCEL published statements with much skepticism and even suspicion from a critical (in the negative sense) point of view.