InvestorsHub Logo

Commons_Cancelled

10/02/20 6:44 PM

#635288 RE: bcde #635286

We can only hope that SCOTUS will not make school children doubt what they have been taught about Constitution.


Definitely not a "All-in / Bet the House" investing situation.

Commons continue to be nothing more than a Gamble.

Robert from yahoo bd

10/02/20 8:13 PM

#635294 RE: bcde #635286

Well why did Congress create a single director, fireable for cause only under HERA, do you know?

Also, it appears the Nationalization of the gses was something UST wanted prior to 2008, as TH pointed out in his Amicus Brief. All this stuff takes time to Discover. ESPECIALLY WHEN THE US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT USES EVERY TRICK IN THE BOOK TO CONCEAL IT!

It's not really a simple constitutional concept, did you see the separation of powers problem with HERA in 2008?

The problem is what is the appropriate remedy for not having a fireable at will FHFA Director, they could remand back to the 5th Circuit to decide if the NWS was ratified by an uninsulated FHFA Director, like in Seila.

Or, and I see this as a good possibility, they could say since it was an APA violation by an unconstitutionally insulated federal agency director, the NWS is void ab initio.