Hi AZ,
thank You and Borddork for detailed work and DD.
I don't know how the transfer of rights and obligations works in the US, but I think it doesn't matter if COOP is the new parent or a subsidiary only.
Why ?
In all cases, the Boarddork's findings are clear that a high number of trusts fall under WMIH Corp under the LEI number. If we (even incorrectly) consider that COOP is the altered (however) parent of WMIH Corp, then all rights and obligations pass to COOP, from WMIH Corp AS WELL and thus the trusts settlement for the years 2008-2020 for escrows, and this obligation would pass from WMIH Corp to COOP - so I don't see any problem in changing or transitioning (possibly) from WMIH Corp to COOP.
Because at both cases the money will flow to the escrows markers. Or through the WMIH Corp or through the COOP.
This transfer of rights and obligations is valid in EU for corporate and/or financial companies. So I suppose the same rule should apply in this WAMU case in US.
Or am I wrong?
GLTA
Muff
Sorry, english is not my mother language, but I hope all understand my point of view and the main idea.