Agree Bio, the conference call was bad, from the standpoint of when it was announced (no need to give 6 days advance notice), to the execution, the phone-in calls that are not screened...and could well be bogus bad actors, to the poor communication on Naders part and also the lack of control on his part.
I don't know why we even have them. A well crafted PR that has been proofed several times outlining EXACTLY what is meant to be communicated to shareholders in EXACTLY the terms/verbage that is required would be FAR superior to the call.
It would eleminate ANY misinterpretation or misunderstanding of what is being communicated. It would also eliminate ANY opportunity for personal anecdotes, temper tantrums etc. Just my opinion