News Focus
News Focus
icon url

niczar

08/26/20 7:05 PM

#127405 RE: tsand #127399

This scenario is where "forward looking statements " would appropriately apply .

The Company has,a PO for xxxxxxx. They know the value of the contract and most likely have a binding finalization date attached to it.

If the product moves without delay, the quicker the payment and the sooner it shows up on financials.

A forward looking statement ( with all boilerplate disclaimers) would effectively let the investing public know that for instance $250,000 worth off sales have occurred.

icon url

skitahoe

08/26/20 7:07 PM

#127406 RE: tsand #127399

I agree completely, we don't know if the U.K. pays anything up front before the equipment is built, or if nothing comes in until it's delivered. I'm uncertain, but believe it's a lease, like in U.S. hospitals, but that's just a guess as well.

I believe the company needs substantial funding to build the equipment, but once substantial equipment is in place it should be very profitable.

I really don't know how many units can be put into a standard freight container, but I've got to believe that they're broken down in a manner that allows as many as possible, then must be assembled in the U.K. on arrival.

In time many of these things might be answered, or we may just learn of income attributed to the U.K. We might all like to know the details, but I suspect that we'll learn what we're doing in dollars, but few details.

Gary
icon url

easyme

08/26/20 8:24 PM

#127410 RE: tsand #127399

The U.K. partnership alone is enough to want to own this stock. This is HUGE!

PCTL!