Replies to post #32950 on Cel Sci Corporation (CVM)

[MyAlias1]

Seems like drones would have a similar capability albeit would not be able to carry the same payload. So you envision C-4 manikins riding in a Tesla which is programmed to park beside a building?

[sab63090]

OK, understand your view....just my opinion, I will no longer discuss $TSLA or other companies here.

Always 2 sides to markets, stocks, opinions, and methods of operating in the stock market.

I think it's best to concentrate on $CVM and not stir up emotions in other areas.

Lots of people just want to read about Cel-Sci and now the 3 remaining issues at hand.....data lock, top line data, and final "full analysis" without any clear cut timeline.

It's crazy.....lol

[BRMachine]

Interesting take Lightrock, however, I don’t believe terrorists using an autonomous vehicle to deliver a bomb will destroy the market.

The threat of car bombs already exists, so really the only thing that would change is the need for a suicide bomber to drive the vehicle and terrorist organizations do not have a shortage of those.

I would think that initially the high cost and limited availability (easily traced, small resale market) of autonomous vehicles would be prohibitive for terrorists to use them. Also, the GPS and sensors used to drive them would make it easy to track where the vehicle has been and cameras on the vehicle would record images of who was around the vehicle. If any of those are disabled, then the vehicle doesn’t work.

The terrorists may eventually find a way to use them, but by the time that happens, they will be so ingrained in western society that people won’t just stop buying them.