News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Tuslog28

12/21/06 12:18 PM

#223199 RE: InvestorOtter #223176

InvestorO: You have been on this board long enough to know that everything promised or "strongly" indicated as going to happen has NOT BEEN DELIVERED by anyone manageing/working for or speaking for SLJB, including Petar and Steve. Nothing. Not to be confrontational but name one thing they PR'd that has been delivered and is verifiable. Nothing, zipo, bupkis, nada, nutt'n. Not one thing.

...and don't bring up Sam's because we don't know that Sam's is inside the SLJB shell. We do know that Petar said he bought Sam's with his $500,000. Someone would have to tell me how a disassociated person can spend his money to buy Sam's and place that company inside SLJB unless that person has a realtionship with SLJB (which has not been disclosed to SLJB stockholders)?
icon url

allmanchase

12/21/06 12:18 PM

#223201 RE: InvestorOtter #223176

And talking privately to specific shareholders "isn't"illegal? Yipes. Who's in charge of this Dog and Pony Show? Let's take Shakespeare's advice since Sulja is so close to Stratford on Avon:
"First we kill all the lawyers!"

icon url

MrGoodBuddy

12/21/06 12:21 PM

#223209 RE: InvestorOtter #223176

My friend, you dont know lawyers very well then.. Lawyers have means by which to state things that are potential through the careful use of language.

Come on now, I want this to all turn out good too trust me (in at .12) but you are fooling yourself.

Lawyers can and will provide info if it is not a blatant lie for the benefit of their "clients" if they wish for it to be released. They can even state that they are waiting for "whatever" before it is a sure thing.

Please, take what I am saying for the truth.. I am not trying to BS you here and I am still in it with you too.
icon url

bizzyboy2

12/21/06 12:52 PM

#223287 RE: InvestorOtter #223176

Wisdom speaks,,wonder who may listen~