News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Newly2b

10/12/03 10:24 PM

#160244 RE: Bacchus_II #160238

The danger of naked shorting is that a volume shorter can flood the market with shares, overwhelming demand with supply, thus driving the stock price down. This is equivalent to price manipulation, and is probably why naked shorting isn't allowed.

Newly
icon url

Alex G

10/12/03 10:59 PM

#160253 RE: Bacchus_II #160238

no, it's not like a secondary offering, you don't create more shares when you short

when you short a security your brokerage firm has to "borrow" those shares from someone else's long position... there are only so many shares available... also, a person who owns the stock can specify that his shares are not to be lent out for shorting

"naked" shorting is pure manipulation... this occurs when shares that were never borrowed are sold illicitly in the market. The seller collects money for the sale but no shares are delivered, since, the current rules do not require delivery to be made... there are new proposals to include a rule that requires the delivery of the shares by the settlement date... the naked shorting problem is mostly confined to very thinly traded stocks, these thinly traded stocks can be easily manipulated, that's why it shouldn't be allowed