News Focus
News Focus
icon url

spaceheater

12/19/06 5:24 PM

#221146 RE: jranalyst #221132

Very thoughtful and intelligent post. Interesting explanation for the whole scenario. I hope you're dead on. If so, it surely bodes well for those still invested imho.
icon url

nycjgalt

12/19/06 5:59 PM

#221163 RE: jranalyst #221132

Excellent post. Well done...
icon url

ed53wa

12/19/06 7:51 PM

#221234 RE: jranalyst #221132

jranalyst: Well thought out and logical, obviously speaking from experience? Thanks for that input
icon url

MrGoodBuddy

12/19/06 8:02 PM

#221240 RE: jranalyst #221132

Food for thought, well said.. I hope that there is credence to it.. Seems both calculated and deceptive, but if it pans out then I guess no harm no foul.

Problem though is that alot of people may never give it another chance? I am a stuckholder and dont care because it will not break the bank..

I hope you are right though, because if "proven" true in the future, it could well be worth it..

Or not, and we all still can have the memories and questions to haunt us..
icon url

byrdman

12/19/06 8:12 PM

#221244 RE: jranalyst #221132

post of the day! very interesting and probably close to reality
icon url

booger

12/19/06 9:43 PM

#221281 RE: jranalyst #221132

Great Post!

mo
BD
icon url

MarionPolk

12/19/06 9:55 PM

#221288 RE: jranalyst #221132

A more likely scenario is that once upon a time "insiders" owned almost 500 million shares of a nearly worthless stock.

They concocted a scheme including a "merger".

They put out a bunch of press releases without real substance.

They sold all their shares for over $50 million.

Someone sold another 100 million shares for over $10 million.

The "public" now owns a small lumber business in Canada, if they ever get around to electing new directors.