News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BonelessCat

06/25/20 7:00 AM

#305671 RE: loanranger #305668

Yes, the control compared to the B showed B with a 95 and 97 percent reduction. The statement only is meant to establish that the control (placebo) had almost none or no reduction in viral particles. Leo’s words are standard expressions in lab reports for control vs. active.

You’re making more out of this than is at all necessary. But, I now understand that is your point: parsing for common/non-science understanding of lab report language, then making a lot out of nothing.
icon url

Hungry_Ghost

06/25/20 7:38 AM

#305680 RE: loanranger #305668

Show us anything that had a 98% reduction while also being SAFE to humans or just go _____ __________...

GO "97% CV KILLER BRILACIDIN" GO
icon url

Jhawker

06/25/20 8:02 AM

#305689 RE: loanranger #305668

Basically what you are saying is that the RBL’s are giving out false and misleading information to the company. Or could it be you are just trying to create confusion? I think we all know the answer.
icon url

attilathehunt

06/25/20 8:42 AM

#305706 RE: loanranger #305668

compared to control,"


Take your pick...



Control is one of two...

1). Control was placebo - meaning it was left untreated....How good is 97% in this scenario?

2). Control used the best to date remedy...How good is 97% with this scenario?


Your panties are in a bind over nothing!