InvestorsHub Logo

TheHound

06/24/20 10:54 AM

#305347 RE: BonelessCat #305345

Thanks again! 5th time is a charm ;-)

I’ll try this once again

Jhawker

06/24/20 11:04 AM

#305353 RE: BonelessCat #305345

Your explanation is so simple and straightforward that even a simpleton could understand it!

UP Trend

06/24/20 11:11 AM

#305356 RE: BonelessCat #305345

Let’s not forget 11000 compounds... B came out on top.

BIzzy

06/24/20 11:16 AM

#305358 RE: BonelessCat #305345

Throwing knowledge into a black hole designed to suck the life out of this stock and investors....death by parsing

steelyeye

06/24/20 1:24 PM

#305431 RE: BonelessCat #305345

Even I could understand this, well done. Perhaps we'll hear again from BigKahuna in the near future. Hope your time in SE Asia has been productive and fruitful.

...two sets of the same culture in the same nutrient medium. Both are infused with the same number of virus particles. Two treatment solutions are prepared. One is a solution of B at therapeutic concentrations (2 different concentrations). The other, the placebo solution, is the solute medium only. This is not a treatment efficacy comparative study. There is no secret ingredient or known antiviral in the control. It merely establishes that by some miracle the neutral solute didn’t destroy viruses. The B solution reduced the number of virus particles by 95 and 97 percent. The control viral count remained unchanged; therefore, B is responsible for the 95 and 97 percent reduction. Again, the placebo, more accurately the control is not a comparator. It only acts to show that the only difference between the two cultures and treatments was B.

loanranger

06/24/20 3:06 PM

#305488 RE: BonelessCat #305345

"B is responsible for the 95 and 97 percent reduction. Again, the placebo, more accurately the control is not a comparator. It only acts to show that the only difference between the two cultures and treatments was B."

I thought I understood that from the gitgo. It doesn't seem to address the question as posed by PP: "So, how good are Brilacidin results?"

I haven't been disabused of the notion that OF COURSE Brilacidin is almost 100% better than nothing. Was that the market moving revelation? If not, what was?

Apparently.....
5th time wasn't a charm, I'm not smart enough to be a simpleton and someone said that even they could understand, as if you wouldn't have expected them to be able to.
So somebody has to be able to dumb down the answers for me...I fully admit that I need that.