Replies to post #615517 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[FFFacts]

The decisions challenged will have implications for the other “illegal” actions they took, for instance “for cause” is illegal, do they have the authority to put companies into conservatorship that are solvent, and even though the BOD agreed would they have agreed to act in the worst case possible for shareholders, and because they acted the way they did is the old BOD responsible or FHFA-C, the law says certain things and those things even if not challenged will give a problem to the solution, as the government cannot act outside their own statute, so relief must be given on the lawsuits, and challenged wrongdoings, and all actions taken by FHFA-C that do not follow their statute need to be reversed, because they need to follow the statute on which they act and that is not implement or allow a 3th amendment so it needs to be reversed inside court or outside, it is just something that NO regulator could do

And the list goes on and on, But to make a long story short, FHFA runs into problems that are not challenged but still need to be fixed

What decisions are being challenged right now aside from the NWS?

What decisions should be challenged? What is the statute of limitations? How can anything be successfully challenged with the succession clause in place?