Replies to post #85845 on Decision Diagnostics Corp (DECN)

[pumper_stumper]

Okay then, now can we see the prior DECN update/amendment? Link?

[IPwatcher]

Example of amendment and approval

This letter is not relevent.
Is it DECN? No
Does it state the reason the DECN was not in condition for acceptance by the FDA?
No.

Could a spurious EAU application be submitted to the FDA? Absolutely.
Would an EAU be granted off the back of it?
Absolutely not.
Could it be amended and resubmitted?
Absolutely
Could the amended EAU application be just as spurious as well?
Absolutely.
Would an EAU be issued off the back of it?
Absolutely not.
Could it be amended and resubmitted?
Absolutely
Could the amended EAU application be just as spurious as well?
Absolutely.
Would an EAU be issued off the back of it?
Absolutely not.
Could it be amended and resubmitted?
Absolutely
Could the amended EAU application be just as spurious as well?
Absolutely.
Would an EAU be issued off the back of it?
Absolutely not.
Could it be amended and resubmitted?
Absolutely
Could the amended EAU application be just as spurious as well?
Absolutely.
Would an EAU be issued off the back of it?
Absolutely not.

... and so on.

We HAVE BEEN LED TO BELIEVE that the DECN EUA has been amended 2x after it was allegedly first submitted on April 3rd
But the only thing we know for sure is that an EAU has not been granted to DECN.

(That and the fact that 131 EUAs HAVE been granted to other companies that did not have the advantage of being present on ground zero at the start of the outbreak.
But that did have the more real advantage of access to a technology that might actually work!)

Everything else is based on the word of Keith Berman in a press release. Keith Berman's stock was suspended on the basis of false and misleading press releases!

The evidence presented UNDER OATH by the SEC at the time of suspension on April 23rd and published May 20th stated that KB did not have a completed test kit or many of the parts necessary to build one.
Yet shareholders are now being told that the EAU application for that same test kit (the one Berman admitted he did not have) was completed and submitted on April 3rd!? 20 days earlier? Really ???

What can I say?
Other than I think can see why such an EUA submission (for a non existent test kit) might need subsequent amendment!

Wake up people! You're being had! AGAIN!