Hard knocks - my problem with you and we are just annoying others by going back and forth is that you are more concerned with form over substance.
I agree and have agreed, long before you took this current aliass here, that the company should provide full disclosure and start with at least preparing and disclosing AF's.
Beyond that, the SPAC entity could have been abandoned and the same net result concluded by using another entity, recorded or not recorded. I've said this many times. You haven't refuted it. You just keep saying the same thing over and over.
Beyond that, legal principles in equity, provide that form can be abandoned and that substance and intent will govern over form. If ownership needs to be adjusted or if transactions have to be reformed, nunc pro tunc, then there ways of doing this.
Again, I'm not defending the company in any way. I think you are diffusing the real issues with your attempts to state the company is a scam as a fact, rather than being merely your opinion.
Again, you are entitled to your opinion but your opinion is not made a fact by your spamming repetition. We all understand that your opinion is that they are lying and scamming. We understand that is your opinion and you are entitled to that opinion.
But Please STOP making your opinions appear to be factual.
These are the only facts that we know that are relevant to our discussion:
There is no requirement for SLJB to currently file a Form 211 with the NASD.
There is no requirement for SLJB to currently have AF's reviewed by the SEC.
The default of the SPAC entity proves that filing fees have not been paid, nothing more, nothing less.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
