LP, thank you and we can agree to disagree but I will leave you with these thoughts.
1) On March 19, 2012 (ED), there was an ownership change with ALL previous preferred and common prospectuses canceled along with ALL associated documents
2) LuckyPanda, you, I and others here signed timely releases and received Escrow ShareMarkers due to other investors NOT signing timely releases
3) Therefore, you, I and others have preferred, common or a combination of those markers in our accounts
4) If the 75/25 did not work the way we discuss, there would effectively be two sets of common and preferred investors...A) Those in the trusts that you and others think are not affected by the Delaware bankruptcy laws along with those who did sign releases and B) those investors who DID NOT sign timely releases
5) As CBA09 also advised, the Delaware Bankruptcy laws control and they also dictate ownership such as the case of the ownership change on 3/19/2012, otherwise and again, there would be two sets of owners, pre and post-bankruptcy case filings and this cannot and did not happen
6) Delaware Bankruptcy laws cannot be cherry-picked then applied-all Safe Harbor and BK remote assets mean is they are protected from creditors and are not to be discussed in the active bk cases but the bk case laws do control ownership rights
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
