Replies to post #609309 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[955]

Lamberth will rule on these direct claims in his court.

ARROWOOD vs US

VI. CONCLUSION
For the reasons stated above, the court dismisses plaintiffs’ claims because it lacks
jurisdiction to entertain their fiduciary duty and implied-in-fact-contract claims, and plaintiffs
lack standing to pursue any of their claims. The court therefore GRANTS defendant’s motion to
dismiss. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Margaret M. Sweeney
MARGARET M. SWEENEY
Chief Judge

http://www.glenbradford.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/13-698-0069.pdf

[FFFacts]

That's assuming Sweeney has jurisdiction to hear derivative claims if defendants appeal. That is still unknown. She may have to punt that as well.