News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ChannelTrader

12/13/06 10:45 PM

#216158 RE: janice shell #216156

Just another "keep the pump going crusade here"
icon url

oreodiamonds

12/13/06 10:49 PM

#216161 RE: janice shell #216156

Janice - No CFO - I have said for months that Steve nor Petar has the ability to understand financial statements.

My #1 wish is now being granted with a CFO being hired.
icon url

marianothis

12/13/06 11:00 PM

#216176 RE: janice shell #216156

janice,
it is irrelevant because, imho (and yes i'm speculating because i don't know - nobody here does btw), they'll take out both revenues and cost of goods sold. it should have zero impact on the earnings per share imho. dishonest? probably. stupid? definately. also, one thing on the taxes. since sljb has offshore offices it is pretty easy to get around the vat taxes. it is a foreign sale by a foreign office.
regards longs,
buddy
icon url

ChrisJP

12/14/06 6:04 AM

#216365 RE: janice shell #216156

The prior financials and proforma include revs from the M.E. which should not have all been in there, as only the commission on the brokered deals should have.

And whose fault was that?


Ummmmmmmmmmmm does PV have me peoplemarked ?

Cuz I posted that more than anything other criticism starting in October.

Ok -- the name of the auditor I posted on a lot too.

Annnnndddddd "Show us your TAX FILINGS !"

Chris