""(he was saying she didn't Release her Preferreds and hence she was trying to get her $3M for her 3000 Ps position, with her whole recent Actions with UWs imbroglio) BUT then, I/we found out what AZCB has been stating about AG were 'untrue' because AG stated in her Filing and in front of the Judge that she 'HAS 3000 P Markers'""
And YES she could NOT HAVE FILED this objection NOR HER APPEAL if she had no DOG IN THE HUNT!!!!!!!!
So you call that statement whatever ya want to I know what I would call it, but won't since it would violate TOS rules
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
